Friday, May 20, 2011

I Heart Rhian's Donor

Olivia Pratten is a 28 year old journalist.  She was  conceived by donor sperm in the '80's.  Things for couples and single women who needed donor sperm were very different then - and the prevailing attitude seemed to be don't tell anyone (including your child) that you used donor sperm.  Donors were truly anonymous, and recipients and children were told very, very little about their donor (including very scant medical information).

Ms. Pratten wanted to know who her donor was and she embarked on an odyssey that ultimately ended up in litigation.  The British Columbia Supreme Court handed down its ruling this week.  This article gives the basics, and links to the decision.

Sperm donor anonymity overturned by B.C. court - British Columbia - CBC News

 I read the decision.

I liked the decision. And not just because some of the players in the litigation had a direct hand in helping me conceive Rhian!

In a nutshell, the court found that the Provincial government discriminated against donor conceived children since donor conceived children were not provided the same protections as adopted children.  The Court found that donor conceived children and adopted children have many similarities with respect to not knowing who their biological parents are - and both groups should be afforded the same protections.

The upshot is that the Court struck down certain provisions of BC's adoption law, and gave the government 15 months to come up with a legislative scheme that also protects donor conceived children as well as adopted children.  Essentially - no more anonymous donors in BC.  And no more destruction of donor information by clinics, physicians etc.

I'm not exactly sure what that will look like now.  Until the legislation is in force we don't really know what will happen with donor anonymity.  Will it be enough for a donor's identifying information to be released upon a child reaching the age of majority?  Or will the identifying information have to be made available before conception, after pregnancy is confirmed, after birth, or some other time?  What about people that used anonymous donors previously and now want a second child with the same donor?  Will it be (can it be) retroactive?  Will it simply mirror the current provisions of the adoption act (of which I am not familiar)?  How will it apply to donors that are from a different jurisdiction (most donor sperm is collected at American Sperm Banks)?  What happens if a person/couple just hops over to Alberta or other province that does not have the same restrictions for their treatment?  Will the government appeal?  So many questions.

One of the things I completely agree with, is that it is not enough for fertility clinics to say that they already provide the protections sought by Ms. Pratten.  Things have changed, and they simply do not do business this way.

And that is exactly the problem.  Business.

It is a business.  And businesses go under all the time.  And sperm banks go under all the time.  And I imagine fertility clinics also do the same.  And in those circumstances what happens to all the information held by the clinics?  I don't know.  And I agree that their needs to be some governmental regulation in this area ensuring documents are not destroyed, and ensuring that donors that have agreed to consent to release their information when the children are of the age of majority - that the children are not deprived of that opportunity.  I hope that the new legislation will provide some certainty for Rhian should she decide (when she decides?) to search for her donor.

And of course - there is the obvious concern that men will no longer donate if they cannot be anonymous.  I have no idea how to address this.  I am so, so, so, grateful to Rhian's donor - for both donating, AND agreeing to have his ID revealed to her later on.  He will never be expected to parent Rhian, or support her - and from what I gather this is what potential donors fear most.  But by agreeing have his ID released to her later on he has given her a great gift.  She will have questions - and he will be the only one that can answer them.  There is of course, no guarantee that he will - but given that he has agreed to release his information - I'm hoping that won't change.

And should Rhian ever wish to contact him, and should she ever contact him - I can't wait to thank him with every ounce of my being - for giving me the greatest gift - one that only he could.  I love him for that.

11 comments:

  1. Very interesting. I can't wait to see how it all shakes out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I immediately thought about whether donors would continue to donate if they were no longer able to stay anonymous longterm or till 18. My thoughts are truly that this industry will suffer at least a small blow in that case. Sad. I'm interested in how this will turn out.

    I, too, am grateful for my son's donor. He is an ID options donor also and without him, I wouldn't have the greatest person in my world or the security that comes from having further information later in his life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So interesting...
    I wonder if this will change the Canadian Compliant criteria from the US cryobanks.

    I agree with more regulation here too (I'm from the US). The industry has changed so much in the past 30 years and it's time to catch up, for the sake of every donor child out there.

    Great thought provoking post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even the donor ID ones can change their minds. There is no guarantee that when L turns 18 he will still be willing to be known. That aspect has bothered me, becuase it cost extra to get donor consent samples, and I chose that route because I wanted L to have the option to know more about her other half of genes. Most of the sperm that women use in Canada comes from the US, and what are the implications there. Will Canadian Compliant now mean that the donor must be ID consent? Since they can change their minds, how will that work? I'm for openness but the law needs to catch up to protect all parties involved. The up side is that with more openness, the stigma of using a donor will hopefully fade into the distance.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm glad my donor is also ID release. I think one of the ridiculous parts of the business is the extra cost for ID release donors. I wanted my son to have that opportunity to know who his donor is but I know there are no guarantees that they will want to connect. Time will tell, it is a long way off since he is only 12 days old. At least the opportunity is available.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also chose an ID donor. I feel it says so much about the donor and his character and the gravity of the situation. I so admire ID donors but I hope that laws don't take away those that want to donate anonymously.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am not familiar with donors (you are the only blog of this kind that I read) but I heard this story on the news and you are who I thought of. I'm. So happy that you agree with the decision, since it can affect so much in your life.

    When you say "ID donor" does that mean you get to see him first? Or a picture? Or is this info only availale to Rhian when she's older?

    You may need to educate me :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. wow I am very much interested in your blog.
    I am 19 years old and I have always been curious and amazed about pregnancy and motherhood.
    I had a traumatic experience when I was a child that made want to be single forever.(that can change)
    But I would love to have a child someday!
    Thanks for the inspiration and I would be following you!

    http://nicsytoh-me.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  9. lovely bloggggggggggggggg
    i followed youuuuuuuu
    plzzz follow my bloggggg
    www.lovewidapple.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, it's either all business - or it's love!
    If you are saying you could love this unknown man for this great gift - doesn't that make you think that you would also be able to love a man you married and had children with, and if only because he gave you this great gift?!
    Marriages are seldom perfect, but they make sense. Just like it makes sense that a child grows up with mother AND father.
    And love can be cultivated, and re-cultivated. There are many more things that you can love in a man on top of the fact that he is the father of your child.
    My suggestion (as long as he's not abusive or an addict...): Go and find him and convince him to marry you!
    There always has been more sense in life than what you alone can come up with!!!

    ReplyDelete